Author/Authors :
Johan Ormel، نويسنده , , Judith Rosmalen، نويسنده , , Ann Farmer، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background Neuroticism measures are very
popular in psychopathological research,but it is unclear
how useful neuroticism is in studies of the aetiology of
psychopathology. Method A conceptual examination
was made of the literature on the association of neuroticism
and psychopathology, the ontological status of
neuroticism, the purport of neuroticism questionnaires,
and causal issues. Results The research on which neuroticism
is built has historically been based solely on the
factor analyses of the common adjectives used to describe
usual behaviours. An abundance of studies have
shown that neuroticism scores predict life stress, psychological
distress, emotional disorders, psychotic
symptoms, substance abuse, physical tension-related
symptoms, medically unexplained physical symptoms,
and health care utilisation. This evidence suggests that
neuroticism scales index vulnerability to many forms of
negative affect and psychiatric disorder. However, the
associations do not clarify the nature of this vulnerability
nor the underlying psychobiological mechanisms.
We present evidence that neuroticism scores reflect a
person’s characteristic (or mean) level of distress over a
protracted period of time. In this perspective, even
prospective associations of neuroticism with mental
health outcomes are basically futile, and largely tautological
since scores on any characteristic with substantial
within-subject stability will predict, by definition,
that characteristic and related variables at later points in
time. Conclusion Neuroticism is not an explanatory concept
in the aetiology of psychopathology, since it measures
a person’s characteristic level of distress over a
protracted period of time.This situation will not change
until knowledge becomes available about: (i) the mechanisms
that produce high neuroticism scores (and,
therefore, also psychopathology) and (ii) its neurobiological
substrate.Only then will we understand why neuroticism
appears to ‘predict’ the outcomes it predicts