Title of article :
Working with mental health problems: clients’ experiences
of IPS, vocational rehabilitation and employment
Author/Authors :
Marsha Koletsi، نويسنده , , Astrid Niersman، نويسنده , , Jooske T. van Busschbach، نويسنده , , Jocelyn Catty ?
Thomas Becker، نويسنده , , Tom Burns، نويسنده , , Angelo Fioritti، نويسنده , , Rana Kalkan، نويسنده , , Christoph Lauber ?
Wulf Ro¨ssler، نويسنده , , Toma Tomov، نويسنده , , Durk Wiersma، نويسنده , , for the EQOLISE Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Background Although the effectiveness of individual
placement and support (IPS) has been well established,
little is known about clients’ perceptions of the model
compared to usual vocational rehabilitation, nor about their
experiences of searching for and returning to work with
this kind of support. This qualitative study aimed to
explore clients’ views of the difficulties of obtaining and
maintaining employment, their experiences of the support
received from their IPS or Vocational Service workers and
the perceived impact of work on clients’ lives.
Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with
48 people with psychotic disorders participating in a sixcentre
international randomised controlled trial of IPS
compared to usual vocational rehabilitation. To assess their
experiences of the services and the perceived effects of
working, two IPS and two Vocational Service clients at
each centre who had found work during the study period
were interviewed, along with two IPS and two Vocational
Service clients at each centre who had not.
Results IPS clients reported having received more help
seeking and maintaining employment, whereas Vocational
Service clients reported having received more help in
finding sheltered employment or placements. Clients who
had worked associated this with financial stability,
improved social lives, increased self-esteem, integration
into society and amelioration of their symptoms, as well as
reduced feelings of boredom and isolation, but also
reported increased levels of stress. IPS clients as well as
Vocational Service ones reported not receiving enoughfollow-up support, despite this being proposed as a key
feature of the model.
Conclusion Findings from the in-depth interviews reflect
differences in service models that have also been tested
quantitatively but further work in disaggregating the IPS
model and assessing the impact of each component would
be valuable.
Keywords :
Severe mental illness Employment Vocational rehabilitation Qualitative assessment
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)