Title of article :
Developing and comparing methods for measuring
the content of care in mental health services
Author/Authors :
B. Lloyd-Evans، نويسنده , , M. Slade، نويسنده , , D. P. Osborn، نويسنده , ,
R. Skinner، نويسنده , , S. Johnson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Abstract :
Background Measurement of what happens in mental
health services is needed to describe services, identify
variation in care provision and understand service outcomes.
However, there is no consensus about appropriate
methods or measures for content of care. Previous research
has primarily used a single information source and prioritised
staff over patient perspectives on content of care. This
study aims to enhance understanding of how to measure
content of care by developing and evaluating four instruments,
each using a different measurement method.
Methods Development is described by four instruments—
CaSPAR, CaRICE, CCCQ-S and CCCQ-P—which use
researcher observation, staff-report and patient-report to
measure the intensity and nature of care at services. Interrater
reliability of CaRICE and CCCQ-S was investigated.
Concordance between staff and patient perspectives was
explored through assessing inter-rater agreement of CCCQ-S
and CCCQ-P questionnaires. The convergence of data from
the measures collected in an inpatient multi-site study was
investigated.
Results CaRICE demonstrated good inter-rater reliability
(j = 0.71). CCCQ-S inter-rater reliability was poor. Concordance
between staff and patient reports was low: there
was a trend for patients to report less care received than
staff reported had been provided. Results from CaSPAR,
CaRICE and CCCQ-P exhibited divergence, indicating
possible differences in patient, staff and researcher
perspectives.
Discussion Information about content of care should be
sought as close as possible to the point of delivery. There
may be differing, valid perspectives about care provided by
services. Further development of methods to measure
content of care is required. Meanwhile, a multi-methods
approach should be adopted, which allows inclusion of
different perspectives (specifically including the patient’s
perspective) and triangulation of results from different
measurement methods. CaSPAR, CaRICE and CCCQ-P
can provide multi-perspective content of care measurement
in inpatient services.
Keywords :
Process measurement Content of care Inpatient Mental health services
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)