Author/Authors :
T. S. Brugha، نويسنده , , N. Taub، نويسنده , , J. Smith، نويسنده , , Z. Morgan، نويسنده , ,
T. Hill، نويسنده , , Allan H. Meltzer، نويسنده , , C. Wright، نويسنده , , T. Burns، نويسنده , , S. Priebe، نويسنده , , J. Evans، نويسنده , , T. Fryers، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background Assertive community treatment for the
severely mentally ill is being implemented increasingly
internationally. It is unclear whether recommended characteristics
of assertive outreach (AO) teams influence care
and outcomes. We hypothesised that recommended characteristics
of AO teams such as joint health and social care
management would predict reduced hospitalisation in the
first year of an AO client programme and related outcomes
throughout England.
Methods A two-stage design was used: a stratified sample
of 100 of the 186 ‘stand-alone’ AO teams in England and a
systematic sample of clients from each team with stratification
for black and ethnic minority patients. Team characteristics,
treatment and outcomes were collected from
teams. Analyses took account of patients’ histories, clustering
and ethnic minority over-sampling.
Results Under AO the proportion of time spent in hospital
following admission decreased. Only 3/1,096 patients went
missing in 9 months. Although patient’ histories significantly
predicted outcomes almost no team characteristics
predicted re-admission or other patient outcomes after 1
and 3 years. Ethnic minority clients were more likely to
be on compulsory orders only on jointly managed teams
(P = 0.030). Multidisciplinary teams and teams not working
out of hours significantly predicted that patients received
psychological interventions, but only 17%of sampled patients
received such treatments.
Conclusions Characteristics of AO teams do not explain
long-term patient outcomes. Since recommended team
characteristics are not effective new models of care should
be developed and the process of care tested. Managing
teams to implement evidence-based psychological interventions
might improve outcomes