Author/Authors :
Inma Jarr?´n، نويسنده , , Ana Garc?´a-Fulgueiras، نويسنده , , Vicente Iba´n?ez-Rojo، نويسنده , , De´bora Alvarez، نويسنده , , Roc?´o Garc?´a-Pina، نويسنده , , Alberto Ferna´ndez-Liria، نويسنده , , Visitacio´n Garc?´a-Ortu´zar، نويسنده , , Domingo D?´az، نويسنده , , Maria A ´ ngeles Rodr?´guez-Arenas، نويسنده , ,
Luc?´a Mazarrasa، نويسنده , , Maria-Victoria Zunzunegui، نويسنده , , Alicia Lla´cer، نويسنده , , Julia del Amo، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Purpose We aimed to study the association between the
Ecuadorians’ ethnic density (EED) of the areas of residence
(AR) with the mental health of Ecuadorians in Spain.
Methods Multilevel study of 568 Ecuadorian adults in 33
AR randomly selected from civil registries and interviewed
at home. Possible psychiatric case (PPC) was measured by
scoringC5 inGeneral Health Questionnaire-28. Ecuadorians’
ethnic density was dichotomized in high and low EED
(\6 %). Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate
odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results Prevalence of PPC, 24 % (95 %CI 20–28 %),
varied by area of residence. Ecuadorians’ ethnic density
varied by area of residence ranging from 0.9 to 19.5 %.
PPC prevalence in High Ecuadorians’ ethnic density AR was
29.5 and 20.4 %in low EED AR (p 0.013). Ecuadorians from
High EED AR had higher odds of PPC than those from Low
EED AR (OR 1.65 95 %CI 1.01–2.72). Adjusting for individual
confounders (largely self-perceived discrimination),
OR decreased to 1.48 (95 %CI 0.87–2.55). The final model,
adjusted by area of residence and educational level, yielded an
OR 1.37 (95 %CI 0.78–2.40).
Conclusions No protective association between the Ecuadorians’
ethnic density of the Area of residence and
Ecuadorian migrants’ mental health was found. Mechanisms
underlying beneficial ethnic density effects may be
absent in recent migration settings.