Author/Authors :
Raimo K. R. Salokangas، نويسنده , , Dorien H. Nieman، نويسنده , , Markus Heinimaa، نويسنده , , Tanja Svirskis، نويسنده , , Sinikka Luutonen، نويسنده , ,
Tiina From، نويسنده , , Heinrich Graf von Reventlow، نويسنده , , Georg Juckel، نويسنده , , Don Linszen، نويسنده , , Peter Dingemans، نويسنده , , Max Birchwood، نويسنده , ,
Paul Patterson، نويسنده , , Frauke Schultze-Lutter، نويسنده , , Joachim Klosterko¨tter، نويسنده , , Stephan Ruhrmann، نويسنده , , European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS) Group، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Purpose In patients at clinical high risk (CHR) of psychosis,
transition to psychosis has been the focus of recent
studies. Their broader outcome has received less attention.
We studied psychosocial state and outcome in CHR
patients.
Methods In the European Prediction of Psychosis Study,
244 young help-seeking CHR patients were assessed with
the Strauss and Carpenter Prognostic Scale (SCPS) at
baseline, and 149 (61.1 %) of them were assessed for the
second time at the 18-month follow-up. The followed
patients were classified into poor and good outcome
groups.
Results Female gender, ever-married/cohabitating relationship,
and good working/studying situation were associated
with good baseline SCPS scores. During follow-up,
patients’ SCPS scores improved significantly. Good follow-
up SCPS scores were predicted by higher level of
education, good working/studying status at baseline, and
white ethnicity. One-third of the followed CHR patientshad poor global outcome. Poor working/studying situation
and lower level of education were associated with poor
global outcome. Transition to psychosis was associated
with baseline, but not with follow-up SCPS scores or with
global outcome.
Conclusion The majority of CHR patients experience
good short-term recovery, but one-third have poor psychosocial
outcome. Good working situation is the major
indicator of good outcome, while low level of education
and non-white ethnicity seem to be associated with poor
outcome. Transition to psychosis has little effect on psychosocial
outcome in CHR patients. In treating CHR
patients, clinicians should focus their attention on a broader
outcome, and not only on preventing transition to
psychosis.