Title of article :
RANDOMISED ACTIVE PROGRAMS ON HEALTHCARE WORKERS’ FLU
VACCINATION IN GERIATRIC HEALTH CARE SETTINGS IN FRANCE:
THE VESTA STUDY
Author/Authors :
M. ROTHAN-TONDEUR1، نويسنده , , 2، نويسنده , , 3، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Abstract :
Background: Because of a lack of efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly population, there
are still numerous outbreaks in geriatric health care settings. The health care workers (HCW) flu vaccination
is known to get herd immunity and decrease the impact of influenza in elderly population living in geriatric
health care settings. However, the rates of vaccinated HCWs are still low in France. The French Geriatric
Infection Risk Institute (ORIG) performed the VESTA study, a three-phase multicentre to identify factors
limiting vaccination in HCWs, and to develop and implement active programs promoting HCWs influenza
vaccination. Objectives: To implement multicenter programs to enhance HCW influenza vaccination.
Design: It was a cluster randomised interventional studies. Setting: 43 geriatric health care settings
(GHCSs), long term care and rehabilitation care settings in France. Participants: 1814 Health care workers
from 20 GHCSs in the interventional group and 2,435 health care workers in 23 GHCSs in the control
group. Intervention: After the failure of a first educational program giving scientific information and. tested
during the 2005-06 flu season in 43 HCSs, a second program was designed with the help of marketing
experts, one year after Program 1. The objectives were to involve HCWs in the creation of “safety zones”,
and to give personal satisfaction. Program 2 was tested during the 2006-07 season. 20 of the 24 HCSs from
the Program 1 cluster were included in the Program 2 cluster (1,814 HCWs), and 16 of the 19 HCSs from
the Control 1 cluster, plus 7 new HCSs with interest in participating, were included in the Control 2 cluster
(23 HCSs; 2,435 HCWs). Measurements: The efficacy of each program was assessed by calculating and
comparing the percentage of vaccinated HCWs, from all HCSs taken together, in the program and control
clusters. Results: Program 1 failed to increase the HCW vaccination coverage rate (VCR) (Program 1: 34%;
Control 1: 32%; p>0.05),). Program 2 increased the VCR in HCWs (Program 2: 44%; Control 2: 27%; Chi2
test, p<0.001) regardless their occupational group but only in the non previous vaccinated subgroup.
Conclusions: In geriatric health care centres in France, an active multicenter program giving personal
satisfaction and taking into account the profile of non-vaccinated HCWs was more effective in promoting
flu vaccination than a scientifically factual information program. HCW involvement is required in program
implementation in order to avoid rejection of top-down information.
Keywords :
Elderly People , healthcare worker , Program evaluation , Influenza vaccine
Journal title :
The journal of nutrition, health & aging
Journal title :
The journal of nutrition, health & aging