Title of article
AcomparisonbetweenJapaneseandFrenchA16defectassessmentproceduresforcreep-fatiguecrackgrowthOriginalResearchArticle
Author/Authors
T.Wakai، نويسنده , , C.Poussard، نويسنده , , B.Drubay، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
8
From page
245
To page
252
Abstract
Thispaperpresentstheresultsofabenchmarkoncreep-fatiguecrackgrowthevaluationforaplatesubjectedtocyclicbendingloadswitha1hdwell.Thesimplifiedcreep-fatiguecrackgrowthevaluationmethodsofJNCinJapanandA16proceduresproposedbyCEAinFrancearepresented.Themethods,basedonthereferencestressapproach,arecomparedeachother.Theyarefoundtodifferintheexpressionusedforthereferencestresssolutionusedtoestimatethecreepstrain.ItisalsopointedoutthatincontrasttotheA16procedures,theJNCmethodtakesheterogeneouscreepstraindistributionintoaccountforsmallscaleyieldingcondition.Thepredictionsobtainedbythemethodsarealsocomparedtotheexperimentaldata.Itisfoundthatthemethodsexhibitconservatismswhicharesignificantlyreducedwhenintegratingthecreepcurvecontinuouslywithoutinitialisationduringtheexperiment[ProceedingofSMiRT14(G13/2),Creep-FatigueCrackGrowthonCT25Specimensin316L(N)stainlesssteelat650°C].
Journal title
Nuclear Engineering and Design Eslah
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
Nuclear Engineering and Design Eslah
Record number
894585
Link To Document