Title of article
AcomparisonbetweenJapaneseandFrenchA16defectassessmentproceduresforthermalfatiguecrackgrowthOriginalResearchArticle
Author/Authors
T.Wakai، نويسنده , , M.Horikiri، نويسنده , , C.Poussard، نويسنده , , B.Drubay، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
8
From page
937
To page
944
Abstract
Thispaperpresentstheresultsofabenchmarkonthermalfatiguecrackgrowthevaluationforathick-wallcylindersubjectedtocyclicthermaltransients.ThesimplifiedcrackgrowthevaluationmethodsofbothJNCinJAPANandA16proceduresproposedbyCEAinFrancearepresented.Thepredictionsobtainedusingbothmethodsarecomparedwiththeexperimentaldata.TheJNCmethod,whichaccountsforthenon-linearstresscomponentprovidespredictionsofcrackadvanceinagoodagreementwiththeexperimentaldata.Incontrast,significantdifferencesareobservedbetweentheA16predictionsandtheexperimentaldata.Thediscrepanciesaremainlyduetothenon-linearstresscomponentwhichisnotaccountedforintheA16method.WhenusingtheJNCstressintensityfactorsolutiondeterminedbyfiniteelementanalysistoaccountforthenon-linearstresscomponent,theA16methodwellpredictsthethermalfatiguecrackgrowthbehavior.
Journal title
Nuclear Engineering and Design Eslah
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
Nuclear Engineering and Design Eslah
Record number
894899
Link To Document