• Title of article

    Behaviorism and belief Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Arthur W. Collins، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
  • Pages
    14
  • From page
    75
  • To page
    88
  • Abstract
    The examination of now-abandoned behaviorist analysis of the concept of belief can bring to light defects in perspectives such as functionalism and physicalism that are still considered viable. Most theories have in common that they identify the holding of the belief that p by a subject S with some matter of fact in or about S that is distinct from and independent of p. In the case of behaviorism it is easy to show that this feature of the theory generates incoherence in the first-person point of view since it gives footing to the possibility that S could correctly assert “I believe that p,” (that is, “I have the complex disposition the behaviorist theory identifies with holding the belief that p”) and at the same time deny that p is the case. Parallel incoherence can be developed in the context of other philosophically popular accounts of the nature of belief.
  • Keywords
    Conversational implication , Disposition , Epistemic risk , Mental reality , Pragmatics , Truth conditions , Behaviorism , Cartesianism , Belief , Self-knowledge
  • Journal title
    Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
  • Serial Year
    1999
  • Journal title
    Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
  • Record number

    896168