Author/Authors :
Rahimi Bashar، Farshid نويسنده Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , , Manuchehrian، Nahid نويسنده Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , , Mahmoudabadi، Mojtaba نويسنده Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , , Hajiesmaeili، Mohammad Reza نويسنده Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran , , Torabian، Saadat نويسنده Hamedan university of medical sciences,Department of otorhinolaryngology ,
Abstract :
Background: Acid suppressive medications are used to prevent stress ulcers in
critically ill patients. Few studies have been done to evaluate the effect of
ranitidine and pantoprazole on stress ulcers. We aimed to compare the effects
of ranitidine and pantoprazole on Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP).
Materials and Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, we
enrolled 120 traumatic patients with trauma admitted to the intensive care unit
(ICU) of Besat Hospital in Hamadan Province located in northwest Iran. The
patients were divided into two equal groups receiving either intermittent
intravenous ranitidine or pantoprazole to prevent stress ulcers. The incidence of
VAP, duration of tracheal intubation, length of ICU stay, duration of hospital
stay, and the outcome of treatment including mortality or hospital discharge
were compared in both groups.
Results: The incidence of VAP was 10% and 30% in patients receiving
ranitidine and pantoprazole, respectively (P=0.006). There was no significant
difference between the two groups with respect to the duration of tracheal
intubation. However, the patients treated with pantoprazole stayed at the
hospital two days longer than the other patients (P=0.027). Although patients
with VAP stayed at the hospital for 12 more days, the two groups had almost
equal mortality rates (P=0.572).
Conclusion: ICU patients using pump inhibitors have a three-fold increased
risk of developing VAP in comparison to H2-blocker receivers. Thus,
prevention of stress ulcers should be limited to its own specific indications.