Author/Authors :
Azari، Mansour R. نويسنده , , Asadi، Parisa نويسنده School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , , Jafari، Mohammad Javad نويسنده School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , , Soori، Hamid نويسنده School of Public Health, Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences , , Hosseini، Vajihe نويسنده School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences ,
Abstract :
Background: Cadavers are preserved in a fixing solution containing formalin.
Formaldehyde (FA) released from formalin is inhaled by the personnel in the
anatomy laboratory. Exposed personnel have reported respiratory problems
and various symptoms. Due to the toxicity of FA as a strong irritant and
carcinogen and also lack of a national study assessing occupational exposure to
FA in gross anatomy labs in Iran, the present study aimed at occupational
monitoring of personnel exposed to FA and evaluating relevant symptoms in
them.
Materials and Methods: A total of 20 subjects (all the staff) working in a gross
anatomy lab and 20 library personnel were considered for occupational
monitoring of exposure to FA during three months with various climatic
conditions. They were also monitored for respiratory symptoms. Air sampling
and analysis of its FA content were conducted according to the NIOSH method
No.2016. Symptoms of cases and controls (library personnel) with active and
passive exposure to formaldehyde were also studied by a self-report
questionnaire.
Results: In the first stage of monitoring with ventilation (supply-exhaust)
system on, the exposure of personnel (Mean± SE) was 306 ± 21ppb. In the
second stage of monitoring the personnelʹs exposure was 317 ± 26ppb with only
the ventilation supply system on and in the final monitoring stage this rate was
698 ± 34ppb with the ventilation system (supply and exhaust) off. In this study,
personal’s exposure level to FA was higher than the indoor concentration, and
the individual exposure levels of instructors were higher than those of the
students. Exposure of library personnel in the adjacent department (central
library) was about 50ppb. Most important complaints reported by actively
exposed staff members and library personnel were the unpleasant odor (68%),
cough (64%), throat irritation and runny nose (56%), burning and itching of
nose (52%) and irritating eyes (48%).
Conclusion: Considering the level of exposure of all subjects in this study and
existence of clinical symptoms, better control of the exhaust system in the gross
anatomy lab and use of a more efficient ventilation system are recommended to
protect the staff and instructors of the Anatomy Department.