Title of article :
Relative availability of satellite imagery and ship-based sampling for assessment of stormwater runoff plumes in coastal southern California
Author/Authors :
Nikolay P. Nezlin، نويسنده , , Stephen B. Weisberg، نويسنده , , Dario W. Diehl، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
Information about the size and intensity of urban runoff plumes in the ocean has traditionally been collected through ship-based surveys, but
sampling from ships in the nearshore zone is weather-dependent because of the rough sea conditions that often accompany storms. Highresolution
satellite imagery is an alternative approach for assessing plume properties, but the availability of satellite imagery can also be
weather-dependent. Here we compare the logistical availability of ship-based sampling and the quality of satellite imagery for assessing rainstorm-
mediated freshwater plumes. The availability of ship-based sampling was assessed by correlating deployment success of three local ships
with wind and wave data and then applying those relationships to a longer wind and wave data record. The quality of satellite imagery was
assessed by correlating cloud cover and expert opinion about the usefulness of Level 2 SeaWiFS imagery, then analyzing those relationships
with respect to cloud cover found in Level 3 AVHRR, SeaWiFS, and MODIS imagery. In the 10 days following storm events, ships were found
to be capable of deployment for sampling about 70% of the time, while SeaWiFS produced high quality images only about 23% of the time. The
days for which satellite imagery and ship-based data were available often differed, yielding complementary, rather than redundant, information.
As a result, plume data were available for about 80% of the study period using one of the methods. The probability of obtaining usable satellite
imagery was lowest on the day of a rainstorm and increased during the next 5 days, whereas the probability of obtaining ship-based data was
highest on the day of the storm and typically declined in the days following a storm. MODIS sensors provided better coverage than SeaWiFS or
AVHRR due to better spectral, spatial, and particularly temporal resolution (twice a day), thereby significantly improving information about
plume dynamics.
Keywords :
Southern California , Coastal waters , plumes , Satellite sensing , monitoring , USA
Journal title :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Journal title :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science