• Title of article

    Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals — a methodological comparison

  • Author/Authors

    Stig Irving Olsen، نويسنده , , Frans M?ller Christensen، نويسنده , , Michael Hauschild، نويسنده , , Finn Pedersen، نويسنده , , Henrik Fred Larsen، نويسنده , , Jens T?rsl?v، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
  • Pages
    20
  • From page
    385
  • To page
    404
  • Abstract
    Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Risk Assessment (RA) are two different tools in environmental management. This article identifies harmonies, discrepancies, and relations between the two tools exemplified by the RA principles of the European Commission (EC) and the LCA method, Environmental Design of Industrial Products (EDIP), developed in Denmark, respectively. A very important feature of LCA is the relative assessment due to the use of a functional unit. RA, on the other hand, is an absolute assessment, which requires very specific and detailed information on e.g. the exposure conditions. It is concluded that the conceptual background and the purpose of the tools are different, but that there are overlaps where they may benefit from each other and complement each other in an overall environmental effort.
  • Journal title
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  • Serial Year
    2001
  • Journal title
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review
  • Record number

    957795