Abstract :
Japan has tried to increase the import of liquefied natural gas (LNG) because of the nationʹs fragile energy supply structure. In Japan, almost all LNG is imported under long-term contracts with a Take-or-Pay clause, although buyers assume considerable risk under such a clause. This paper tries to determine why the Take-or-Pay clause has been retained in LNG import contracts in Japan, focusing on the relation between Take-or-Pay and energy security policy. It is found that the government has not pursued a consistent, consecutive policy on Take-or-Pay under the changing energy situation after oil crises. On the one hand, the government has accepted Take-or-Pay because it secures a stable supply of LNG, but on the other hand, it has tried to scrap Take-or-Pay in order to reduce buyers’ risk. Furthermore, it was not until the middle/late 1990s that the government implemented deregulation. It is concluded that the governmentʹs energy security policy has played an important role in keeping Take-or-Pay in Japan.