Title of article :
Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials
Author/Authors :
Detlef P. van Vuuren، نويسنده , , Monique Hoogwijk، نويسنده , , Terry Barker، نويسنده , , Keywan Riahi، نويسنده , , Stefan Boeters، نويسنده , , Jean Chateau، نويسنده , , S. Serban Scrieciu، نويسنده , , Jasper van Vliet، نويسنده , , Toshihiko Masui، نويسنده , , Kornelis Blok، نويسنده , , Eliane Blomen، نويسنده , , Tom Kram، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
15
From page :
5125
To page :
5139
Abstract :
The Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC reports that greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced by about 30–50% in 2030 at costs below 100 US$/tCO2 based on an assessment of both bottom-up and top-down studies. Here, we have looked in more detail into the outcomes of specific models and also analyzed the economic potentials at the sectoral and regional level. At the aggregated level, the findings of the IPCC report are confirmed. However, substantial differences are found at the sectoral level. At the same time, there seems to be no systematic difference in the reduction potential reported by top-down and bottom-up approaches. The largest reduction potential as a response to carbon prices exists in the energy supply sector. Reduction potential in the building sector may carry relatively low costs. Although uncertainties are considerable, the modeling results and the bottom-up analyses all suggest that at the global level around 50% of greenhouse gas emissions may be reduced at carbon price (costs) below 100$/tCO2-eq—but with a wide range of 30–60%. At a carbon price (costs) less than 20$/tCO2-eq, still 10–35% of emissions may be abated. The variation of results is higher at low carbon-price levels than at high levels.
Keywords :
Emission reduction potential , Energy models , Top-down models
Journal title :
Energy Policy
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Energy Policy
Record number :
972970
Link To Document :
بازگشت