Title of article
Social construction and physical nihilation of the Keystone XL pipeline: Lessons from international relations theory
Author/Authors
Robert Y. Shum، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
4
From page
82
To page
85
Abstract
If a prime goal of energy policy is to achieve energy security, why is there a controversy over the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, designed to deliver new supplies of oil from within North America? This Viewpoint seeks answers in the debate over the underlying purposes of energy policy: how does one answers the question “what do we want from energy policy?” Perceptions of feasible answers and policy options change over time, as witnessed in the 1970s. Analogous shifts in opinion are changing todayʹs policy debates and widening the contradictions in policy purposes. Attention to the existence of these contradictions, without illusions, is necessary to meet the policy challenges of the future effectively.
Keywords
Energy policy , IR theory , Pipeline politics
Journal title
Energy Policy
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Energy Policy
Record number
974307
Link To Document