Title of article :
Alternative measures of pesticide use
Author/Authors :
James C. Barnard، نويسنده , , S. Daberkow، نويسنده , , M. Padgitt، نويسنده , , M.E. Smith، نويسنده , , N.D. Uri، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages :
16
From page :
229
To page :
244
Abstract :
One kilogram of a pesticide is not necessarily equal to a kilogram of a different pesticide. This issue can be significant. Whether it is depends on the use to which pesticide-use data are put. While kilograms of pesticide is the most common way of measuring agricultural chemical use, the type of analysis will generally define what measure of chemical use is best. Quantifying the risk from the exposure to pesticides, for example, typically requires-weighing usage or residues by acute or chronic health and environmental toxicity coefficients and subsequently estimating human or environmental exposure to such hazards. The inferences one draws concerning pesticide use can vary substantially depending on the measure considered.
Keywords :
Agricultural chemical use , persistence , Pesticide use , US agriculture , Toxicity
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Serial Year :
1997
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Record number :
980329
Link To Document :
بازگشت