Title of article :
Objectives, concept and design of the CEEM soil
project
Author/Authors :
G. Wagnera، نويسنده , , U، نويسنده , , M.-E. Mohra، نويسنده , , J. Sprengarta، نويسنده , , A. Desaulesb، نويسنده , ,
H. Muntauc، نويسنده , ,
S. Theocharopoulosd، نويسنده , , P. Quevauvillere، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
Within the member countries of the European Union, different strategies and guidelines for the sampling and the
preparation of soils are used to investigate soil contamination. As a consequence, there is reasonable doubt that the
results gained by applying these different strategies and methods are comparable. In general, the relative contribution
of sampling and sample preparation to the total uncertainty in soil contamination studies is a subject of
speculation than of knowledge. For this purpose, the first European soil sampling inter-comparison test was
organised as a project under the Standards, Measurement and Testing Programme of the European Commission.
The aim of this project was to analyse and to compare the existing guidelines, the degree and the state of
standardisation in this field in the European countries, and to compare their results when applied on the same test
area under comparable conditions by representative sampling teams. The results of the project in general demonstrate
that sampling and sample preparation errors reach about the same order of magnitude as errors caused in the
chemical analysis. However, there are great differences depending on the elements investigated and their concentration
ranges, as well as on pedological and land-use conditions in the test area. Consequently, sampling and sample
preparation require the same attentiveness and equivalent measures for quality assurance QA. and quality control
QC. as the chemical analysis, which has not been the case up to now. Insufficient comparability of the results is
illustrated by the fact that different participants arrive at different conclusions for up to 61% of tested soil quality criteria e.g. threshold levels.. The methods and results of the project are presented in detail in the six following
papers within this volume. The following 13 papers present some key studies and specific contributions of the
participants, as well as synoptical papers of the invited experts in standardisation and accreditation.
Keywords :
sample preparation , Soil contamination , Heavy metals , Comparability , soil sampling , quality control , quality assurance , Sampling inter-comparison
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment