Author/Authors :
Kirsti-Liisa Sj¨obloma، نويسنده , , U، نويسنده , , Anneli Salob، نويسنده , , J. Michael Bewersc، نويسنده , , John Cooperd، نويسنده , ,
Robert S. Dyere، نويسنده , , Neil M. Lynnf، نويسنده , , Mark E. Mountg، نويسنده , , Pavel P. Povinech، نويسنده , ,
Tatyana G. Sazykinai، نويسنده , , Joachim Schwarzj، نويسنده , , E. Marian Scottk، نويسنده , ,
Yuri V. Sivintsev l، نويسنده , , Jennifer E. Tannerm، نويسنده , , John M. Wardenf، نويسنده , ,
Dennis Woodheadn، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The International Atomic Energy Agency responded to the news that the former Soviet Union had dumped
radioactive wastes in the shallow waters of the Arctic Seas, by launching the International Arctic Seas Assessment
Project in 1993. The project had two objectives: to assess the risks to human health and to the environment
associated with the radioactive wastes dumped in the Kara and Barents Seas; and to examine possible remedial
actions related to the dumped wastes and to advise on whether they are necessary and justified. The current
radiological situation in the Arctic waters was examined to assess whether there is any evidence for releases from the
dumped waste. Potential future releases from the dumped wastes were predicted, concentrating on the high-level
waste objects containing the major part of the radionuclide inventory of the wastes. Environmental transport of released radionuclides was modelled and the associated radiological impact on humans and the biota was assessed.
The feasibility, costs and benefits of possible remedial measures applied to a selected high-level waste object were
examined. Releases from identified dumped objects were found to be small and localised to the immediate vicinity of
the dumping sites. Projected future annual doses to members of the public in typical local population groups were
very small, less than 1 mSv } corresponding to a trivial risk. Projected future doses to a hypothetical group of
military personnel patrolling the foreshore of the fjords in which wastes have been dumped were higher, up to 4
mSvryear, which still is of the same order as the average annual natural background dose. Moreover, since any of
the proposed remedial actions were estimated to cost several million US$ to implement, remediation was not
considered justified on the basis of potentially removing a collective dose of 10 man Sv. Doses calculated to marine
fauna were insignificant, orders of magnitude below those at which detrimental effects on fauna populations might be
expected to occur. Remediation was thus concluded not to be warranted on radiological grounds
Keywords :
Arctic seas , radioactive waste , radiation dose , Remedial actions