Author/Authors :
Ursula Gundert-Remya، نويسنده , , *، نويسنده , , Cindy Sonich-Mullin، نويسنده , , IPCS Uncertainty and Variability Planning
Workgroup and Drafting Groupb، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Risk assessment of chemicals is a process which is usually based on data derived from animal testing in which the
exposure of animals results in toxicological effects.By extrapolation, the doseyexposure in humans, which will not
result in toxicological effects ({safe dose’, {safe exposure’), is estimated.T raditional approaches use {safety
factors’ or {uncertainty factors’ to extrapolate from animal to man and from the {mean’ subject to the general
population, including sensitive subgroups.T raditionally, a default factor of 10 has been used to account for interspecies
variation.It is proposed that this factor be subdivided into a subfactor to address the toxicokinetic aspects and a
second subfactor for the toxicodynamic aspects.Likewise, a default factor of 10 with subfactors is proposed to
account for the intraspecies variability.In the framework of the International Program on Chemical Safety’s (IPCS)
project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals, an activity has
been initiated to provide guidance to risk assessors on the use of quantitative chemical specific data to account for
interspecies variation and interindividual variability in risk assessment.T o address the toxicokinetic aspects, the active
species, the relevant internal exposure and the adequate metrics must be considered.Data quality and availability, in
vitro or in vivo, the route of administration and the relevant dose level are relevant information for interspecies
extrapolation.The availability of experimental data, including the relevance of the population studied, the number of
subjects andyor samples obtained in the relevant group allow one to estimate the population distribution, e.g.
difference between central tendency and given percentiles.In a similar fashion, the toxicodynamic data must be
addressed.In addition to the identification of the active chemical species, the relevant endpoint must be determined. In extrapolation from animal to man, in most of the cases, the definitive endpoint (e.g. anemia) is lacking.It can be
substituted by in vitro data (e.g. in vitro hemolysis) if it is a key event and relevant for the toxicity in animal as well
as in humans.In extrapolating from animal to man, the dose–effect relationship plays an important role. To account
for the toxicodynamic variability in the human population, similar aspects have to be taken into consideration, which
have been discussed for toxicokinetics.The IPCS document is available at the IPCS website and risk assessors are
invited to use the framework and report back their experience with it to enable revision and improvement.