Title of article :
Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in
Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA
Author/Authors :
Melissa J. Slotnick، نويسنده , , ?، نويسنده , , Jaymie R. Meliker، نويسنده , , Jerome O. Nriagu، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Abstract :
Health effects associated with chronic, low-level exposures to arsenic in drinking water (<100 μg/L) remain unclear, in part due
to uncertainties in assessing exposure. Drinking water concentrations have been used to assess past exposure to arsenic in
epidemiological studies, under the assumption that a single measurement can be used to estimate historical exposure. This study aims
to better understand (1) temporal variability in arsenic concentrations in drinking water and (2) the impact of point-of-use (POU)
treatment devices on arsenic exposure measurements, and on reliability of the exposure measurement for population-level studies.
Multiple drinking water samples were collected at two points in time (an average of fourteen months apart) for 261 individuals
enrolled in a case-control study of arsenic exposure and bladder cancer in Michigan. Sources of drinking water included private wells
(n=221), public water supplies (n=33), and bottled water (n=7); mean arsenic concentration was highest in private wells (7.28 μg/
L) and lowest in bottled water samples (0.28 μg/L). Arsenic concentrations in primary drinking water samples were highly correlated
(r=0.88, p<0.0001, n=196), with 3% of the water sources exceeding the United States Environmental Protection Agencyʹs
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) in one sample but not in the other sample. Measurement reproducibility did not vary by type
of POU device (e.g., softener, filter, reverse osmosis system). Arsenic concentrations did differ, however, between samples treated
with POU devices and untreated samples taken on the same day. Substantial differences in arsenic concentrations were consistently
observed for reverse osmosis systems; other POU devices had variable effects on arsenic concentrations. These results indicate that
while a single residential arsenic measurement may be used to represent exposure in this region, researchers must obtain information
on changes in water source and POU treatment devices to better characterize population exposures over time.
Keywords :
drinking water , Temporal variability , Exposure assessment , Point-of-use treatment , Arsenic
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment