پديد آورندگان :
Vessal Ghazal نويسنده , Afhami Shirin نويسنده , Gholami Kheirollah نويسنده , Shafaghi Bijan نويسنده , Hekmat Yazdi Sohaila نويسنده
چكيده لاتين :
Antibiotic resistance of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) born aerobic gram-negative
bacteria was evaluated during a six months period at a teaching hospital in Tehran, and
determination of the validity of the results obtained from disc diffusion tests, using discs
manufactured in Iran.
Disc susceptibility tests using Iranian and standard discs (diffusion discs available in
international markets) were performed on 108 aerobic gram-negative isolates obtained from
the clinical samples of patients with at least 72 hours of stay in the ICU. The Minimum
Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) was subsequently determined by collaborators not involved
with the disc testing evaluation.
Acinetobacter was the most frequently isolated gram negative species (26%). High
resistance rates were obtained for all antibiotics studied except for imipenem (98% sensitive).
Results of disc diffusion tests performed by the Iranian discs were in moderate to strong
agreement with those obtained from the standard discs . When comparing disc results with
the MIC results, it was noted that the total number of very major, and minor discrepancies
were approximately the same with both sets of discs. The total number of major discrepancies
was higher for the Iranian discs (more false positive results) . The total number of very major
discrepancy rates was more than the acceptable 1.5% limits for each antibiotic tested, using
both Iranian and standard discs .
High rates of resistance in aerobic gram-negative isolates studied, leaves imipenem as the
only reliable agent for the empirical treatment of ICU infections. The high rates of very major
discrepancies with both sets of discs show that physicians cannot rely on disc diffusion tests
only, in order to guide therapy for the treatment of very serious infections in the ICUs, even if
standard discs are used instead of the Iranian discs , and there is great need to establish a fast
and easy way to determine the MIC values . Although it is better to repeat the study with a much
larger sample size in order to make good judgment.