پديد آورندگان :
Khadem N. نويسنده , Sajadi Tabassi A. GH. نويسنده , Ghomian N. نويسنده , Eflekharzadeh F. نويسنده
چكيده لاتين :
Background: Vulvovaginal candidias is is one of the most
common infections in gynecologic filed, and non-albicans
Candida specie s are emerging causative microorganisms. This
specie s shows resistance to routine treatments. One of the
suggested treatment s is admini stration of vaginal suppositories
of boric acid. The aim of the present study was to compare
boric acid with clotrimazole in the treatment of recurrent or
resistant vulvovaginitis.
Methods: In a double-blind , randomized clinical trial, 90 nonpregnant
women were enrolled . The patients were divided into
two groups to receive ; boric acid (300 mg twice a day for 2
weeks) or clotrimazole ( 100 mg once a day for 2 weeks) intravaginall
y. Treatment responses were monitored by laboratory
and clinical data.
Results: Treatment response s were significantly different in
laboratory resu Its for boric acid and clotrimazo Ie groups
(86.7% v 60%, P= 0.004). Clinical respons es (improved signs
and symptoms) showed no significant differences (8.2. v 6.5,
P= 0.02). Drug side effe cts were not different in boric acid and
clotrim azole groups (13.3% v 11.1%, P= 0.75).
Conclusion: Intra-vaginal administration of boric acid is more
effective than clotrimazole in vaginal candidias is caused by
non-albi cans species.