پديد آورندگان :
Tavajohr Shohreh نويسنده , Rastegar Hossein نويسنده , Ostad Seyed Nasser نويسنده , Rezayat Seyed Mehdi نويسنده , Ghahrernani Mohammad Hossein نويسنده
چكيده لاتين :
Measles has been a major cause of illness and death in children and vaccination against the disease
is part ofthe WHO global immunization program. A suitable vaccine should create maximum immune
response against the pathogen and must be safe for the user. Thus, after production, vaccines must
be analyzed and controlled by the producer and confirm by relevant governmental organizations. The
Food and Drug Control Lab (FDCL), Ministry of Health, is the secondary control center on potency
ofvaccines in Iran. In this study, we have set up the WHO and NIBSC methods in FDCL and compare
these methods on determining the potency of measles vaccine.
Measles vaccines were obtained from Razi Institute Iran. Nine dilutions of vaccine (10-1 to 10-5)
in 0.5 log interval were mixed with Vero cell suspension and seeded. In WHO method , the cells were
incubated at 36°C for 10 days, during which the cells were checked for cytopatic changes everyday. To
set up the assay, we tested the vaccine dilution with four different cell suspensions (2x IOS-5x I04/well)
and four different concentration of serum (2.5-10%). Based on our results, in the assays, 5% serum
and Ix 105 cells were used. The potency assay was performed with six different vaccines produced
in one batch and the mean potency for Measles was 104.32 (PLUS-MINUS) 0.24 CCIDsaivial for a ten-dos e vial. In
NIBSC method following seeding of Vero cells, the medium was removed after 3 hours and overlay
was added. Then the plates were incubated at 35°C for 10 days. After incubation period, the overlay
was removed, the plaque s were stained with methyl violet and counted. This assay was repeated three
times and the mean of the results was 5.83 (PLUS-MINUS) 0.03 10glO PFU/dose.
In this study, we have set up the WHO and NIBSC methods and results indicated that the potency
of the vaccine is in acceptable range in either method. Furthermore, the WHO method is simple and
less time consuming compared to NIBSC which is complicated and requires more effort to produce
reproducible results