اثر المصلحة في اختيار المجتهد القول المرجوح و ترك الراجح في الفقه الاسلامي (دراسة تاصيلية تطبيقية)

The effect of interest in choosing a mujtahid to say the most correct and leaving the most correct in Islamic jurisprudence (an applied root study)

This paper deals with a partial matter of Mufti mattresses and Preponderant structures between sayings in the four Islamic jurisprudence doctrines, namely: to choose the likely saying and leaving Preponderant saying the interest or necessary, pushing them the conditions and developments have taken place due to the changing needs of the people and their interests, and that the work with Preponderant of sayings is not an offbeat work of infraction sayings to the explicit of Quran, Sunnah , the consensus and clear Measurement, the Preponderant of sayings that has weakness guide, and it is in accordance with the conditions and regulations must be observed by the Mufti and industrious alike, and benefit Preponderant sayings working that offers solutions when necessary and achieves reconciling arguing, as the evidence of the flexibility of Islamic Law and validity of every time and place. The researcher linking the issues presented in the folds search a number of examples and applications of jurisprudence at the four Islamic jurisprudence doctrines, and the researcher recommends to track and study the causes reverse jurists and their choice of Likely Say and Leaving The preponderant, and linking them Contemporary Reality through the Study of some emerging Issues, Both in the Jurisprudence of Muslim Minorities or the Jordanian Personal Status Law