شماره ركورد كنفرانس :
3976
عنوان مقاله :
Investigating error structure effect on possible solutions in the three-way models
پديدآورندگان :
Omidikia Nematollah Chemistry Department, (IASBS), Zanjan , Abdollahi Hamid Abd@iasbs.ac.ir Chemistry Department, (IASBS), Zanjan
كليدواژه :
Maximum Likelihood Estimation , MLPARAFAC , Error structure , Feasible region , MLPCA , Matrix augmented MCR , ALS.
عنوان كنفرانس :
ششمين سمينار ملي دوسالانه كمومتريكس ايران
چكيده فارسي :
The main assumption behind most of chemometrics tool is identical independent
distribution (i.i.d) for noises structure [1]. Alternating lest-squares and principal
component analysis provides maximum likelihood (ML) estimation in the i.i.d condition
[1]. Unfortunately this assumption will be violated in most of experimental cases.
Hence, maximum likelihood paves the way to a modification on the basic chemometrics
tools [2]. MLPCA and MLPARAFAC are state of art chemometrics tool for the analysis
of fallible two-way and three-way data sets [3]. Error structures can be categorized in
six different cases and these cases encompass all of the possible structures that will be
dealt with. Error structure of a data set can be a combination of these cases [4].
Different MLPARAFAC algorithms were developed in order to a trilinear
decomposition of three-way data sets [3].
The aim of this contribution is two-folded. 1) The effect of noise structure on the
possible solution of multi-way models will be highlighted. In other words calculation of
feasible regions will extended to the MLPARAFAC models. Data sets with different
known error structure were simulated and feasible regions were calculated. It was
shown that the error effect is non-uniform and complex on the possible solutions.
2) In the same analogy with MLPCA-MCR-ALS, MLPCA-MA-MCR-ALS will be used
for handling error structure of three-way data sets. It should be highlighted that
MLPCA-MCR-ALS provides reliable estimation of profiles such as MCR-WLAS in
noisy measurements [4,5]. Finally, the results confirmed that the resolved profiles
obtained by MLPCA-MA-MCR-ALS are practically identical to those obtained by
ML-PARAFAC and that they can differ from those resolved by ordinary
PARAFAC-ALS, especially in the case of high noise. In MLPCA-MA-MCR-ALS with
trilinearity constraint, MLPCA is only used as a preliminary data pretreatment before
MA-MCR analysis and this is the possible advantage over MLPARAFAC and it does
not require changing the traditional PARAFAC algorithm.