پديدآورندگان :
مجتبي زاده محمد m.mojtabazadeh@yahoo.com نويسنده مسئول:استاديار گروه برنامه¬ريزي علوم اداري و مديريت، دانشكده علوم انساني واحد خدابنده، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، واحد خدابنده، خدابنده، ايران. , عباس پور عباس abbaspour@atu.ac.ir دانشيار دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي، گروه مديريت و برنامه¬ريزي آموزشي، تهران، ايران , ملكي حسن استاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي، گروه برنامه¬ريزي درسي، تهران، ايران. , فراستخواه مقصود دانشيار مؤسسه پژوهش و برنامه¬ريزي آموزش عالي، گروه برنامه¬ريزي آموزش عالي، تهران، ايران.
چكيده لاتين :
Dr Mohammad Mojtabazadeh (Corresponding Author), Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Administration Science, Daneshvar University of Science and Technology, Khodabandeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khodabandeh, Iran. Tel 09126410457, Email: m.mojtabazadeh@yahoo.com
Dr Abbas Abbaspour, Associate Professor, Department of Management and Educational Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba i University , Tehran, Iran
Dr Hasan Maleki, Professor, Department of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba i University , Tehran, Iran
Dr Maghsood Farasatkhah, Associate Professor, Department of Planning in Higher Education, the Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education, Tehran, Iran
In this paper based on the grounded theory, from the perspective of higher education actors we paid to recognized of conditional factors, criteria and indicators (causal, contextual and intermediary ) accreditation. this study, by adopting social interpretivism, emphasize that people outside the university, Can not be known beforehand components of accreditation and understand it. Because, the actors in higher education are that your scientific community environment create and interpret it as they want. accordingly, Any assumption about the accreditation system, can not express the mind and understanding academic community actors. in other words, in this research we have been looking for that actors higher education how to see conditional factors, criteria and indicators (causal, contextual and intermediary ) accreditation And what had interpretation and understanding of it. the data of this study were obtained from four sources, which include, interviews, observations, notes and documents. therefore, data obtained from interviews, observations, notes and documents were converted into text data. after that, in order to categorize the great mass of the collected data, paid to categorization of data. we act first, open coding, then, axial and selective coding. On this basis, in 691 the indicator, 98 criteria and 11 factor were determined in accordance with native features of Iran s higher education system.