Author/Authors :
Demir, Ayşegül Atatürk Training and Research Hospital - Department of General Surgery, Turkey , Gökakın, Ali Kağan Gülhane Military Medical Academy - Department Of General Surgery, Turkey , Üreyen, Orhan Gülhane Military Medical Academy - Department Of General Surgery, Turkey , Altınel, Özcan Gülhane Military Medical Academy - Department Of General Surgery, Turkey , Tezcan, Eyüp Sabri Gülhane Military Medical Academy - Department Of General Surgery, Turkey , Gür, A. Serhat Gülhane Military Medical Academy - Department Of General Surgery, Turkey , Muslu, Ümran Alaca State Hospital - Department of General Surgery, Turkey , Atabey, Mustafa Cumhuriyet University - School of Medicine - Department of General Surgery, Turkey
Abstract :
Aim. Lymphedema is one of the most important complications that occurs secondary to modified radical mastectomy and breast conserving surgery in breast cancer treatment. micronized flavonoid fraction (MFF) (diosmin 90%, hesperidin 10%) is a well known chemical agent used for the acceleration of the flow of lymphatic and venous drainage. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of MFF in the treatment of lymphedema. Method. Fifty-four patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy or breast conserving surgery, because of breast cancer between July 2001 and July 2004 in our clinic were included in the trial. The patients who required post operative axillary radiotherapy were excluded. Patients were randomized into two groups. Groups were allocated as follows: Group I (30 patients): Placebo treatment for six months was performed. Group II (24 patients): Patients were treated with 2x1 .500 mg/day/p.o MFF for six months. The diameters and the volumes of the patients’ arms were measured and recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months. The 10% increase of diameter and/or volume in the arm at the operation side was accepted as lymphedema. The results were evaluated by using Mann Whitney U test. Results. There were 30 patients in group 1 and 24 patients in group 2. No statistically significant difference was detected between the groups by means of preoperative diameter and volume of the arms. Post operative dissected numbers of the lymph nodes were also not different among groups. Postoperative lymphedema was detected in 5 (16.6%) and 4 (10.7%) patients in Group I and in Group II respectively. These results similarly showed no statistically significance. And also we detected no statistically difference between the two groups in the measurements of the arms at the1st, 3rd and 6th month control visits. Conclusion. As a result, the MFF in the treatment of lymphedema can be accepted as ineffective but further investigations with larger number of patients are required to confirm this conclusion.
