DocumentCode
1012412
Title
Patent Claims Revisited: Examiners and Trolls
Author
Emma, Philip G.
Author_Institution
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Volume
26
Issue
3
fYear
2006
Firstpage
96
Lastpage
95
Abstract
In this article, the author revisits the writing of claims, and demonstrates two other styles of writing them. In one style, the author shows how to write a more narrow and focused claim. In the other style, he shows how to write claims that are beyond broad - claims that can be written prior to actually inventing anything. Note that a patent claim must be a single sentence, although it may contain many clauses. The clauses are generally separated by semicolons, with corresponding line breaks to make the structure more apparent and enhance its readability. The author describes a tactic that is sometimes used by companies that are strictly in the intellectual property (IP) business. These are companies that file and market patents but produce no other goods. Companies that do this are called "patent trolls". They have no intent to create anything of value; instead, they generate revenue exclusively by filing lawsuits
Keywords
legislation; patents; broad claim; claim writing; intellectual property business; lawsuit filing; narrow claim; patent claim; patent trolls; Art; Buildings; Capacitors; Marine vehicles; Protection; Writing;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Micro, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0272-1732
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MM.2006.62
Filename
1650187
Link To Document