• DocumentCode
    1012412
  • Title

    Patent Claims Revisited: Examiners and Trolls

  • Author

    Emma, Philip G.

  • Author_Institution
    IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
  • Volume
    26
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2006
  • Firstpage
    96
  • Lastpage
    95
  • Abstract
    In this article, the author revisits the writing of claims, and demonstrates two other styles of writing them. In one style, the author shows how to write a more narrow and focused claim. In the other style, he shows how to write claims that are beyond broad - claims that can be written prior to actually inventing anything. Note that a patent claim must be a single sentence, although it may contain many clauses. The clauses are generally separated by semicolons, with corresponding line breaks to make the structure more apparent and enhance its readability. The author describes a tactic that is sometimes used by companies that are strictly in the intellectual property (IP) business. These are companies that file and market patents but produce no other goods. Companies that do this are called "patent trolls". They have no intent to create anything of value; instead, they generate revenue exclusively by filing lawsuits
  • Keywords
    legislation; patents; broad claim; claim writing; intellectual property business; lawsuit filing; narrow claim; patent claim; patent trolls; Art; Buildings; Capacitors; Marine vehicles; Protection; Writing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Micro, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0272-1732
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MM.2006.62
  • Filename
    1650187