• DocumentCode
    1019300
  • Title

    BLGAN: Bayesian Learning and Genetic Algorithm for Supporting Negotiation With Incomplete Information

  • Author

    Sim, Kwang Mong ; Guo, Yuanyuan ; Shi, Benyun

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. & Commun., Gwangju Inst. of Sci. & Technol., Gwangju
  • Volume
    39
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2009
  • Firstpage
    198
  • Lastpage
    211
  • Abstract
    Automated negotiation provides a means for resolving differences among interacting agents. For negotiation with complete information, this paper provides mathematical proofs to show that an agent´s optimal strategy can be computed using its opponent´s reserve price (RP) and deadline. The impetus of this work is using the synergy of Bayesian learning (BL) and genetic algorithm (GA) to determine an agent´s optimal strategy in negotiation (N) with incomplete information. BLGAN adopts: (1) BL and a deadline-estimation process for estimating an opponent´s RP and deadline and (2) GA for generating a proposal at each negotiation round. Learning the RP and deadline of an opponent enables the GA in BLGAN to reduce the size of its search space (SP) by adaptively focusing its search on a specific region in the space of all possible proposals. SP is dynamically defined as a region around an agent´s proposal P at each negotiation round. P is generated using the agent´s optimal strategy determined using its estimations of its opponent´s RP and deadline. Hence, the GA in BLGAN is more likely to generate proposals that are closer to the proposal generated by the optimal strategy. Using GA to search around a proposal generated by its current strategy, an agent in BLGAN compensates for possible errors in estimating its opponent´s RP and deadline. Empirical results show that agents adopting BLGAN reached agreements successfully, and achieved: (1) higher utilities and better combined negotiation outcomes (CNOs) than agents that only adopt GA to generate their proposals, (2) higher utilities than agents that adopt BL to learn only RP, and (3) higher utilities and better CNOs than agents that do not learn their opponents´ RPs and deadlines.
  • Keywords
    Bayes methods; genetic algorithms; learning (artificial intelligence); BLGAN; Bayesian learning; automated negotiation; combined negotiation outcomes; deadline-estimation process; genetic algorithm; mathematical proofs; optimal strategy; reserve price; search space; Automated negotiation; Bayesian learning (BL); genetic algorithms (GAs); intelligent agents; negotiation agents; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Automation; Bayes Theorem; Computer Simulation; Humans; Models, Theoretical; Negotiating;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1083-4419
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TSMCB.2008.2004501
  • Filename
    4695985