• DocumentCode
    1036880
  • Title

    Comments on two methods for designing a digital equivalent to a continuous control system

  • Author

    Hall, S.R.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Aeronaut. & Astronaut., MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Volume
    39
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1994
  • Firstpage
    420
  • Lastpage
    421
  • Abstract
    Rattan (1984, 1989) suggests two methods for designing a digital control system to match the performance of a given continuous control system as closely as possible. In this note, two main points are made. First, there are a number of errors in the paper by Rattan (1989) that significantly affect its conclusions. Second, neither of the methods is guaranteed to produce a stable closed-Loop system, even if the original closed-loop system is stable. In fact, the two methods will generally lead to unstable closed-loop systems when the number of free parameters in the compensator design process is large.<>
  • Keywords
    closed loop systems; compensation; control system synthesis; digital control; discrete systems; stability; compensator; continuous control system; digital control system; stable closed-Loop system; unstable closed-loop systems; Control systems; Design methodology; Digital control; Equations; Frequency response; Process design; Space technology; Terminology; Transfer functions; Transforms;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9286
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/9.272348
  • Filename
    272348