DocumentCode
103806
Title
Multi-Center MRI Carotid Plaque Component Segmentation Using Feature Normalization and Transfer Learning
Author
van Engelen, Arna ; van Dijk, Anouk C. ; Truijman, Martine T. B. ; van´t Klooster, Ronald ; van Opbroek, Annegreet ; van der Lugt, Aad ; Niessen, Wiro J. ; Kooi, M. Eline ; de Bruijne, Marleen
Author_Institution
Depts. of Med. Inf. & Radiol., Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Volume
34
Issue
6
fYear
2015
fDate
Jun-15
Firstpage
1294
Lastpage
1305
Abstract
Automated segmentation of plaque components in carotid artery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important to enable large studies on plaque vulnerability, and for incorporating plaque composition as an imaging biomarker in clinical practice. Especially supervised classification techniques, which learn from labeled examples, have shown good performance. However, a disadvantage of supervised methods is their reduced performance on data different from the training data, for example on images acquired with different scanners. Reducing the amount of manual annotations required for each new dataset will facilitate widespread implementation of supervised methods. In this paper we segment carotid plaque components of clinical interest (fibrous tissue, lipid tissue, calcification and intraplaque hemorrhage) in a multi-center MRI study. We perform voxelwise tissue classification by traditional same-center training, and compare results with two approaches that use little or no annotated same-center data. These approaches additionally use an annotated set of different-center data. We evaluate 1) a nonlinear feature normalization approach, and 2) two transfer-learning algorithms that use same and different-center data with different weights. Results showed that the best results were obtained for a combination of feature normalization and transfer learning. While for the other approaches significant differences in voxelwise or mean volume errors were found compared with the reference same-center training, the proposed approach did not yield significant differences from that reference. We conclude that both extensive feature normalization and transfer learning can be valuable for the development of supervised methods that perform well on different types of datasets.
Keywords
biological tissues; biomedical MRI; blood vessels; diseases; image classification; image segmentation; learning (artificial intelligence); medical image processing; automated segmentation; carotid artery magnetic resonance imaging; fibrous tissue; intraplaque hemorrhage; lipid tissue; multicenter MRI carotid plaque component segmentation; plaque components; plaque vulnerability; supervised classification techniques; supervised methods; tissue classification; training data; transfer learning; widespread implementation; Biomedical imaging; Histograms; Image segmentation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Observers; Training; Atherosclerosis; carotid; classification; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); segmentation; transfer learning;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0062
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMI.2014.2384733
Filename
6994296
Link To Document