DocumentCode
1043335
Title
Comparison of Known PD Signals With the Developed and Commercial HFCT Sensors
Author
Birlasekaran, S. ; Leong, Weng Hoe
Author_Institution
Queensland Univ. of Technol., Brisbane
Volume
22
Issue
3
fYear
2007
fDate
7/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
1581
Lastpage
1590
Abstract
Increasing need of cost effective identical sensors for partial discharge (PD) location prompted us to take up this research study. Four high-frequency current transformers (HFCT) were assembled and its performances with a used commercial sensor were compared with the known type of PD signals. In this paper, the responses due to surface, oil corona and air corona are analyzed. PD occurrence in 20 ms period and the shape of single PD with more sampled data points are characterized using seven techniques. The study indicates that HFCT with biflar winding is more sensitive in identifying different types of known PD. The number of turns and gauge of the used wire in HFCT play a role in increasing the sensitivity of PD detection.
Keywords
condition monitoring; corona; current transformers; high-frequency transformers; partial discharge measurement; sensors; HFCT sensors; HV apparatus; Weibull distribution; air corona; biflar winding; cluster analysis; condition monitoring; high-frequency current transformers; oil corona; partial discharge location; partial discharge signals; phase distribution; signal processing; time-frequency transformation; Assembly; Corona; Costs; Current transformers; Partial discharges; Petroleum; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Shape; Surface discharges; Wire; Cluster analysis; HFCT; condition monitoring; partial discharge; phase distribution; signal processing; time-frequency transformation; wave shape of single PD; weibull distribution;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Power Delivery, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0885-8977
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TPWRD.2007.899795
Filename
4265652
Link To Document