DocumentCode
1059845
Title
Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition
Author
Ananthakrishnan, S. ; Narayanan, Shrikanth
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Volume
17
Issue
1
fYear
2009
Firstpage
138
Lastpage
149
Abstract
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely almost exclusively on short-term segment-level features (MFCCs), while ignoring higher level suprasegmental cues that are characteristic of human speech. However, recent experiments have shown that categorical representations of prosody, such as those based on the Tones and Break Indices (ToBI) annotation standard, can be used to enhance speech recognizers. However, categorical prosody models are severely limited in scope and coverage due to the lack of large corpora annotated with the relevant prosodic symbols (such as pitch accent, word prominence, and boundary tone labels). In this paper, we first present an architecture for augmenting a standard ASR with symbolic prosody. We then discuss two novel, unsupervised adaptation techniques for improving, respectively, the quality of the linguistic and acoustic components of our categorical prosody models. Finally, we implement the augmented ASR by enriching ASR lattices with the adapted categorical prosody models. Our experiments show that the proposed unsupervised adaptation techniques significantly improve the quality of the prosody models; the adapted prosodic language and acoustic models reduce binary pitch accent (presence versus absence) classification error rate by 13.8% and 4.3%, respectively (relative to the seed models) on the Boston University Radio News Corpus, while the prosody-enriched ASR exhibits a 3.1% relative reduction in word error rate (WER) over the baseline system.
Keywords
acoustic signal processing; speech recognition; unsupervised learning; ASR system; Boston University Radio News Corpus; acoustic components; annotation standard; automatic speech recognition; categorical prosody model; linguistic components; prosody labeling; unsupervised adaptation technique; word error rate; Automatic speech recognition; Error analysis; Humans; Labeling; Lattices; Natural languages; Rhythm; Speech enhancement; Speech recognition; Stress; Categorical prosody models; lattice enrichment; speech recognition; unsupervised adaptation;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1558-7916
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TASL.2008.2005347
Filename
4740157
Link To Document