• DocumentCode
    1059845
  • Title

    Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition

  • Author

    Ananthakrishnan, S. ; Narayanan, Shrikanth

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
  • Volume
    17
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2009
  • Firstpage
    138
  • Lastpage
    149
  • Abstract
    Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely almost exclusively on short-term segment-level features (MFCCs), while ignoring higher level suprasegmental cues that are characteristic of human speech. However, recent experiments have shown that categorical representations of prosody, such as those based on the Tones and Break Indices (ToBI) annotation standard, can be used to enhance speech recognizers. However, categorical prosody models are severely limited in scope and coverage due to the lack of large corpora annotated with the relevant prosodic symbols (such as pitch accent, word prominence, and boundary tone labels). In this paper, we first present an architecture for augmenting a standard ASR with symbolic prosody. We then discuss two novel, unsupervised adaptation techniques for improving, respectively, the quality of the linguistic and acoustic components of our categorical prosody models. Finally, we implement the augmented ASR by enriching ASR lattices with the adapted categorical prosody models. Our experiments show that the proposed unsupervised adaptation techniques significantly improve the quality of the prosody models; the adapted prosodic language and acoustic models reduce binary pitch accent (presence versus absence) classification error rate by 13.8% and 4.3%, respectively (relative to the seed models) on the Boston University Radio News Corpus, while the prosody-enriched ASR exhibits a 3.1% relative reduction in word error rate (WER) over the baseline system.
  • Keywords
    acoustic signal processing; speech recognition; unsupervised learning; ASR system; Boston University Radio News Corpus; acoustic components; annotation standard; automatic speech recognition; categorical prosody model; linguistic components; prosody labeling; unsupervised adaptation technique; word error rate; Automatic speech recognition; Error analysis; Humans; Labeling; Lattices; Natural languages; Rhythm; Speech enhancement; Speech recognition; Stress; Categorical prosody models; lattice enrichment; speech recognition; unsupervised adaptation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1558-7916
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TASL.2008.2005347
  • Filename
    4740157