DocumentCode
1063743
Title
The Biggest Loser Competition
Author
O´Shea, Peter ; Bigdan, Vladimir
Author_Institution
Queensland Univ. of Technol., Brisbane
Volume
51
Issue
1
fYear
2008
Firstpage
123
Lastpage
130
Abstract
This paper outlines a Biggest Loser (BL) competition for engineering undergraduates. Like the television show of the same name, the BL competition has initial and final ldquoweigh-insrdquo as well as ldquopersonal trainers.rdquo The weigh-ins are essentially assessments of students´ preliminary and final achievements. Between the initial and final weigh-ins students are required to lose as much ldquounderachievementrdquo as possible, i.e., they must improve as much as possible, and must enlist personal (peer) trainers to facilitate that improvement. In order to motivate student engagement in the competition, assessment bonuses are made available to those who improve the most. However, these bonuses must be shared equally between the BLs (i.e., biggest improvers) and their peer trainers. The higher achieving students realize that their best strategy for securing a bonus is to help poorly achieving students improve. For this reason, many of the more gifted students willingly commit to mentoring students who need help. Two implementations of the competition for first-year undergraduates have produced impressive and statistically significant improvements in learning.
Keywords
computer aided instruction; engineering education; student experiments; Biggest Loser competition; assessment bonus; engineering undergraduate; Australia; Curriculum development; Educational technology; Electrical engineering; Employee welfare; Engineering education; Government; Incentive schemes; Mineral resources; TV; Active learning; curriculum development; engineering education; just-in-time learning; peer mentoring;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Education, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9359
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TE.2007.906614
Filename
4448430
Link To Document