• DocumentCode
    1074234
  • Title

    Contrast agent response to chirp reversal: simulations, optical observations, and acoustical verification

  • Author

    Novell, Anthony ; Der Meer, Sven ; Versluis, Michel ; Jong, N. ; Bouakaz, Ayache

  • Author_Institution
    CNRS, Tours
  • Volume
    56
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    6/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1199
  • Lastpage
    1206
  • Abstract
    Active response of a microbubble is characterized by its resonance behavior where the microbubble might oscillate after the excitation waveform has been turned off. We investigate in this paper an excitation approach based on this resonance phenomenon using chirps. The technique, called chirp reversal, consists in transmitting a first excitation signal, the up-sweep chirp (UPF) of increasing frequency with time, and a second excitation signal, the down-sweep (DNF) that is a replica of the first signal, but time reversed with a sweep of decreasing frequency with time. Simulations using a modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation were carried out to determine bubble response to chirp reversal. In addition, optical observations and acoustical measurements were carried out to corroborate the theoretical findings. Results of simulations show differences between bubblesiquest oscillations in response to up-sweep and down-sweep chirps mainly for transmitted center frequencies above the bubbles resonance frequency. Bubbles that are at resonance or far away from resonance engender identical responses. From the optical data, the larger bubbles showed different dynamics when up-sweep or down-sweep chirps were transmitted. Smaller bubbles (< 2 mum diameter) appear to be less sensitive to frequency sweep at 1.7 MHz center frequency. However, driven at a higher center frequency, smaller bubbles tend to be more sensitive. These results were confirmed through the acoustical measurements. We concluded that simulations and experimental data show that significant differences might be observed between bubblesiquest responses to UPF and DNF chirps. We demonstrate in this study that, for an optimal use of chirp reversal, the transmit frequency should be higher than the resonance frequency of the contrast microbubbles.
  • Keywords
    acoustic resonance; acoustic variables measurement; bubbles; fluid oscillations; nonlinear acoustics; active response; chirp reversal; contrast agent response; down-sweep chirp; excitation waveform; microbubble; modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation; nonlinear acoustic properties; resonance behavior; up-sweep chirp; Acoustic measurements; Chirp; Equations; Optical sensors; Resonance; Resonant frequency; Acoustics; Algorithms; Contrast Media; Image Enhancement; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-3010
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1161
  • Filename
    5075102