DocumentCode :
1080771
Title :
Decentralized Detection With Censoring Sensors
Author :
Appadwedula, Swaroop ; Veeravalli, Venugopal V. ; Jones, Douglas L.
Author_Institution :
Massachusetts Inst. of Technol. Lincoln Lab., Lexington
Volume :
56
Issue :
4
fYear :
2008
fDate :
4/1/2008 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
1362
Lastpage :
1373
Abstract :
In the censoring approach to decentralized detection, sensors transmit real-valued functions of their observations when "informative" and save energy by not transmitting otherwise. We address several practical issues in the design of censoring sensor networks including the joint dependence of sensor decision rules, randomization of decision strategies, and partially known distributions. In canonical decentralized detection problems involving quantization of sensor observations, joint optimization of the sensor quantizers is necessary. We show that under a send/no-send constraint on each sensor and when the fusion center has its own observations, the sensor decision rules can be determined independently. In terms of design, and particularly for adaptive systems, the independence of sensor decision rules implies that minimal communication is required. We address the uncertainty in the distribution of the observations typically encountered in practice by determining the optimal sensor decision rules and fusion rule for three formulations: a robust formulation, generalized likelihood ratio tests, and a locally optimum formulation. Examples are provided to illustrate the independence of sensor decision rules, and to evaluate the partially known formulations.
Keywords :
decision theory; knowledge based systems; optimisation; sensor fusion; adaptive systems; censoring sensor networks; decentralized detection; decision strategies randomization; distribution uncertainty; generalized likelihood ratio tests; joint optimization; locally optimum formulation; optimal sensor decision rules; partially known distributions; robust formulation; send/no-send constraint; sensor fusion rule; Distributed detection; Neyman-Pearson (N-P) testing; least favorable distribution; locally optimum testing; robust hypothesis testing;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1053-587X
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TSP.2007.909355
Filename :
4456697
Link To Document :
بازگشت