Corrections to "Bounds on the minimum number of data transfers in WFTA and FFT programs"

The relative performance of the 120 point WFTA and the 128 point FFT reported in the above paper [1] must be modified slightly due to errors in tabulation of arithmetic and data transfer operations. A correct comparison is presented in this correspondence. Nonetheless, the 120 point WFTA still remains the faster algorithm for the general-purpose computer architecture considered.