DocumentCode :
1101489
Title :
MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?
Author :
Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim
Author_Institution :
Raytheon, Woburn, MA, USA
Volume :
24
Issue :
5
fYear :
2009
fDate :
5/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
8
Lastpage :
12
Abstract :
MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional communication under certain conditions, and MIMO communication also appears to be practical and cost-effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI, ECM, multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious trade-offs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity, and risk considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler, less expensive, and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
Keywords :
MIMO communication; angular measurement; phased array radar; risk analysis; MIMO communication; MIMO phased array radar; angular measurement resolution; radar system risky algorithm; system engineering viewpoint; Electronic countermeasures; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0885-8985
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MAES.2009.5109947
Filename :
5109947
Link To Document :
بازگشت