• DocumentCode
    1111733
  • Title

    Publication, ethics, and scientific integrity

  • Author

    Fielder, John H.

  • Volume
    15
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    1996
  • Firstpage
    104
  • Lastpage
    105
  • Abstract
    The vast majority of scientists are honest and dedicated professionals who are not fudging data, plagiarizing their colleagues´ research, or abusing patients. These are the felonies of scientific practice, and many scientists feel that the reputation of science has been unfairly damaged by the misconduct of a few of their colleagues. The author suggests a complacency about scientific integrity that he believes is mistaken and dangerous. It is tempting to think that because only a tiny fraction of scientists are guilty of this kind of misconduct, then there is no cause for alarm. One of the most widespread and corrosive practices that undermines scientific integrity is “salami science,” slicing a research study into the thinnest possible slices in order to maximize the number of publications
  • Keywords
    professional aspects; data fudging; felonies; misconduct; publications number maximization; research ethics; research plagiarizing; salami science; scientific integrity; scientific publication; Auditory system; Books; Cancer; Ethics; Fabrication; Humans; Mice; Plagiarism; Skin; US Government;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0739-5175
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/51.511993
  • Filename
    511993