DocumentCode :
1122609
Title :
Cable testing: can we do better?
Author :
Bernstein, Bruce S.
Author_Institution :
Div. of Electr. Syst., Electr. Power Res. Inst., Washington, DC, USA
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
fYear :
1994
Firstpage :
33
Lastpage :
38
Abstract :
This article will focus on some of these assumptions in the test procedures employed by the industry, examine why and how they were made, question their validity, see where they have led us, and finally, review how improvements in the process of applying new cable technology may be brought about. The industry has made many advances in the past 20 years. These involve not only tree-retardant, crosslinked polyethylene or strippable insulation shields, but also "very smart" shields with controlled strippability and reduced ion content. We now have water blocking constructions, both using strand filling compounds and metallic moisture barriers. Techniques are available for impregnating or drying aged installed cables to extend life and delay replacement. Perhaps most encouraging is the generally accepted but not universal use of cable jackets which provide mechanical protection and a partial moisture barrier role at minimal increased cost.<>
Keywords :
cable testing; insulation testing; life testing; power cables; aged installed cables; cable jackets; cable technology; cable testing; controlled strippability; cost; delay replacement; drying; impregnating; industry; mechanical protection; metallic moisture barriers; partial moisture barrier role; reduced ion content; strand filling compounds; strippable insulation shields; test procedures; tree-retardant crosslinked polyethylene; water blocking constructions; Aging; Cable shielding; Cables; Construction industry; Delay; Filling; Moisture; Polyethylene; Testing; Trees - insulation;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Electrical Insulation Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0883-7554
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/57.298086
Filename :
298086
Link To Document :
بازگشت