• DocumentCode
    1137921
  • Title

    A head-mounted operating binocular for augmented reality visualization in medicine - design and initial evaluation

  • Author

    Birkfellner, Wolfgang ; Figl, Michael ; Huber, Klaus ; Watzinger, Franz ; Wanschitz, Felix ; Hummel, Johann ; Hanel, Rudolf ; Greimel, Wolfgang ; Homolka, Peter ; Ewers, Rolf ; Bergmann, Helmar

  • Author_Institution
    CARCAS-Group, Kantonsspital Basel, Switzerland
  • Volume
    21
  • Issue
    8
  • fYear
    2002
  • Firstpage
    991
  • Lastpage
    997
  • Abstract
    Computer-aided surgery (CAS), the intraoperative application of biomedical visualization techniques, appears to be one of the most promising fields of application for augmented reality (AR), the display of additional computer-generated graphics over a real-world scene. Typically a device such as a head-mounted display (HMD) is used for AR. However, considerable technical problems connected with AR have limited the intraoperative application of HMDs up to now. One of the difficulties in using HMDs is the requirement for a common optical focal plane for both the realworld scene and the computer-generated image, and acceptance of the HMD by the user in a surgical environment. In order to increase the clinical acceptance of AR, we have adapted the Varioscope (Life Optics, Vienna), a miniature, cost-effective head-mounted operating binocular, for AR. In this paper, we present the basic design of the modified HMD, and the method and results of an extensive laboratory study for photogrammetric calibration of the Varioscope´s computer displays to a real-world scene. In a series of 16 calibrations with varying zoom factors and object distances, mean calibration error was found to be 1.24 ± 0.38 pixels or 0.12 ± 0.05 mm for a 640 × 480 display. Maximum error accounted for 3.33 ± 1.04 pixels or 0.33 ± 0.12 mm. The location of a position measurement probe of an optical tracking system was transformed to the display with an error of less than 1 mm in the real world in 56% of all cases. For the remaining cases, error was below 2 mm. We conclude that the accuracy achieved in our experiments is sufficient for a wide range of CAS applications.
  • Keywords
    augmented reality; biomedical equipment; calibration; focal planes; helmet mounted displays; medical image processing; optical tracking; photogrammetry; position measurement; surgery; augmented reality visualization; clinical acceptance; common optical focal plane; computer-aided surgery; computer-generated image; head-mounted operating binocular; mean calibration error; medical instrumentation; object distances; optical tracking system; photogrammetric calibration; real-world scene; varioscope; zoom factors; Application software; Augmented reality; Biomedical computing; Biomedical optical imaging; Calibration; Computer displays; Content addressable storage; Layout; Surgery; Visualization; Calibration; Computer Graphics; Depth Perception; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure Analysis; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Microscopy, Video; Microsurgery; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Subtraction Technique; Surgical Equipment; User-Computer Interface; Video Recording;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2002.803099
  • Filename
    1076043