DocumentCode :
1147161
Title :
Author´s Reply2
Author :
Weglarz, Jan
Author_Institution :
Institute of Control Engineering, Technical University of Poznan
Issue :
9
fYear :
1982
Firstpage :
898
Lastpage :
898
Abstract :
V. A. Signaevskn is right that Theorem 4 holds only for concave p and that its proof may then be simplified (the thesis is not trivial). However, the practical meaning of this observation is rather not of very great importance. This follows from the fact that in practice the functions ei(si) are convex (in particular linear) or have a concave part for small si, and thus pi(si) are concave (see Corollary 1) or may be replaced by qi(si) which are concave as shown in Fig. 2. This last operation generally leads, of course, to approximate results; it should be noticed however, that the assumption concerning identical tasks (in the sense of pi(si) and vi) is in fact also an approximation of a real world situation.
Keywords :
Central Processing Unit; Control engineering; Optimal scheduling; Processor scheduling;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Computers, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9340
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TC.1982.1676106
Filename :
1676106
Link To Document :
بازگشت