DocumentCode :
1191375
Title :
Authors´ Reply3
Author :
Mine, H. ; Koga, Yohei
Issue :
7
fYear :
1968
fDate :
7/1/1968 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
702
Lastpage :
702
Abstract :
In Theorem 3, it is clearly stated that the fail-safe output of a basic function is severely restricted by the failed output of the preceding basic functions (though two Iff´s in the statement of Theorem 3 should be If´s). It is obvious, as a matter of course, that a single failure of an element in a logical circuit may cause different effects on its following logical functions. It should be noted here that we do not deal with types of internal failures of logical circuits but with outputs of logical functions being restricted by their following logical functions. If open inputs to the terminal logic shown in Fig. 1 of Mr. Foster´s comment are allowed, then the conditions in Theorem 3 are not satisfied any more. This apparently does not cause any inconsistency in our paper.1Examples of fail-safe NOR circuits shown in Section V are illustrated for the construction of fail-safe logical systems only with NOR circuits. This should have been noted in our paper.
Keywords :
Boolean functions; Circuits; Design methodology; Equations; Flip-flops; Helium; Logic; Resistors;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Computers, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9340
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TC.1968.227412
Filename :
1687434
Link To Document :
بازگشت