Comparison of Thermal Infrared Emissivities Retrieved With the Two-Lid Box and the TES Methods With Laboratory Spectra

Knowledge of surface emissivity in the thermal infrared (TIR) region is critical for determining the land surface temperature (LST) from remote-sensing measurements. If emissivity is not well determined, it can cause a significant systematic error in obtaining the LST. The main aim of this paper is to compare different methods for measuring accurate land surface emissivity in the field, namely, the box method and the temperature and emissivity separation (TES) algorithm. Field emissivities were compared with soil spectra from laboratory measurements. Emissivities were measured for the bands of a multispectral radiometer CE312-2 with effective wavelengths at 8.4, 8.7, 9.1, 10.6, and 11.3 mum, similar to the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer TIR bands, and a wide channel 8-13 mum. The measurements were made at two sites in New Mexico: the White Sands National Monument and an open shrub land in the Jornada Experimental Range. The measurements show that for both sites the emissivities derived with the Box method agree with those derived with the TES algorithm for the 10.6 and 11.3 mum bands. However, the emissivities for the shorter wavelength bands are higher when derived with the Box method than those with the TES algorithm, with differences ranging from 2% to 7%. The field emissivities agree within 2% with the laboratory spectrum for the 8-13-, 11.3-, and 10.6-mum bands. However, the field and laboratory measurements in general differ from 2.4% to 9% for the shorter wavelength bands, with the larger value most likely caused by variations in soil moisture.