• DocumentCode
    1205558
  • Title

    A Comparison of Two Methods for Determining the Extracellular Potential Field of an Isolated Purkinje Strand in a Volume Conductor

  • Author

    Harman, Thomas L. ; Liebfried, T.F., Jr. ; Clark, John W., Jr. ; Hibbs, C.Wayne

  • Author_Institution
    Systems Development Department, the Lockheed Electronics Company, and the Bioengineering Group, the Department of Electrical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex. 77001.
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    1975
  • fDate
    5/1/1975 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    174
  • Lastpage
    183
  • Abstract
    The models considered in this study are those of Spach et al., [1], and Clark and Plonsey [6], [7]. Both assume circular cylindrical geometry for the isolated Purkinje strand and input information to the models consists mainly of the recorded transmembrane action potential, the ratio of conductivities of the intra- and extracellular media, the conduction velocity of the action potential, and the radius of the strand. In general the extracellular potentials computed using both methods agree with measured potential data and with each other. However, the Clark-Plonsey method provides a more accurate prediction of both the peak-to-peak magnitude and the separation between peaks of the bipolar extracellular potential waveform, particularly at field points close to the strand.
  • Keywords
    Biomedical engineering; Biomedical measurements; Conductivity; Conductors; Extracellular; Geometry; Heart; Mathematical model; Predictive models; Solid modeling; Action Potentials; Cell Membrane; Humans; Models, Biological; Neural Conduction; Purkinje Cells;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.1975.324557
  • Filename
    4120894