DocumentCode
1205558
Title
A Comparison of Two Methods for Determining the Extracellular Potential Field of an Isolated Purkinje Strand in a Volume Conductor
Author
Harman, Thomas L. ; Liebfried, T.F., Jr. ; Clark, John W., Jr. ; Hibbs, C.Wayne
Author_Institution
Systems Development Department, the Lockheed Electronics Company, and the Bioengineering Group, the Department of Electrical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Tex. 77001.
Issue
3
fYear
1975
fDate
5/1/1975 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
174
Lastpage
183
Abstract
The models considered in this study are those of Spach et al., [1], and Clark and Plonsey [6], [7]. Both assume circular cylindrical geometry for the isolated Purkinje strand and input information to the models consists mainly of the recorded transmembrane action potential, the ratio of conductivities of the intra- and extracellular media, the conduction velocity of the action potential, and the radius of the strand. In general the extracellular potentials computed using both methods agree with measured potential data and with each other. However, the Clark-Plonsey method provides a more accurate prediction of both the peak-to-peak magnitude and the separation between peaks of the bipolar extracellular potential waveform, particularly at field points close to the strand.
Keywords
Biomedical engineering; Biomedical measurements; Conductivity; Conductors; Extracellular; Geometry; Heart; Mathematical model; Predictive models; Solid modeling; Action Potentials; Cell Membrane; Humans; Models, Biological; Neural Conduction; Purkinje Cells;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9294
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TBME.1975.324557
Filename
4120894
Link To Document