• DocumentCode
    121760
  • Title

    Robust current controller design using mu-synthesis for grid-connected three phase inverter

  • Author

    Chhabra, Mohit ; Barnes, Frank

  • Author_Institution
    Electr., Comput., & Energy Eng., Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    8-13 June 2014
  • Firstpage
    1413
  • Lastpage
    1418
  • Abstract
    In this paper a robust current control strategy is proposed for a grid connected three phase inverter. Current controllers based on proportional-integral (PI) control may not always offer the superior tracking performance and harmonic rejection ability of robust controllers. Robust control design offers the ability to design a controller that is robust to modeled uncertainties in the plant. A typical inverter may experience fluctuations in its input DC voltage due to uncertainties in the DC power source. In the case of a solar-inverter, large fluctuations in the input DC voltage typically occur due to varying irradiance levels, and phase and ground faults. An inverter is usually designed to disconnect from service in case its DC voltage strays outside a pre-defined operating range. With a current controller that´s robust with respect to fluctuations in the input DC voltage, the inverter´s operating range could be widened, giving the user more flexibility when designing their system. A common step in the PI based current controller operation is the transformation of three phase signals to their direct-quadrature equivalent. With the use of the repetitive control strategy, the transformation step is no longer required. The repetitive control strategy is chosen because it can reject a large number of harmonics simultaneously, while providing a clean sinusoidal current waveform to the grid, even in the presence of grid load and/or voltage distortions. The repetitive control strategy is implemented via the internal model principle (IMP). By applying mu-synthesis principles, a feedback controller that simultaneously achieves robust stability and robust tracking performance is obtained. To test the proposed inverter controller, the inverter is interconnected to a 500kW solar system. The solar-inverter system model is subject to a host of test scenarios. Simulation performance is compared to an H∞ based optimal current controller, and a PI based current controlle- .
  • Keywords
    PI control; control system synthesis; earthing; electric current control; feedback; invertors; phase control; power generation control; power generation faults; power grids; power system harmonics; power system interconnection; robust control; solar power stations; DC power source uncertainty; DC voltage fluctuation; H∞ based optimal current controller; IMP; PI control; direct-quadrature equivalent; feedback controller; grid-connected three phase inverter; ground fault; harmonic rejection ability; input DC voltage; internal model principle; mu-synthesis principle; phase fault; power 500 kW; proportional-integral control; repetitive control strategy; robust current controller design; sinusoidal current waveform; solar-inverter system model; stability; three signal transformation; tracking performance; voltage distortion; Closed loop systems; Harmonic analysis; Inverters; Robust stability; Robustness; Uncertainty; Voltage control; H∞ control; current controller; harmonic rejection; mu-synthesis; optimal control; robust control;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2014 IEEE 40th
  • Conference_Location
    Denver, CO
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925182
  • Filename
    6925182