Author_Institution :
Dept. of Math. Sci., San Diego State Univ., CA, USA
Abstract :
This paper discusses both point and interval estimation of the survivor function S0=Pr{X⩾x0} for the geometric distribution. When the number of devices n⩾50, the performance of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE) of S0 are essentially equivalent with respect to the relative mean-square-error (RMSE) to S0. However, when the failure probability per time unit p⩾0.50, and n⩽30, the UMVUE is preferable to the MLE with respect to the RMSE. For interval estimation of S0 with no censoring, 4 asymptotic interval-estimators are derived from large-sample theory, and one from the exact distribution of the negative binomial. When p⩽0.2 and n⩾30, all 5 interval-estimators perform reasonably well with respect to coverage probability. Since using the interval estimator derived from the exact distribution can assure “coverage probability”⩾“desired confidence”, this estimator is probably preferable to the other asymptotic ones when p⩾0.50, and n⩽10. Finally, consider right-censoring, in which the failure-time that occurs after a fixed follow-up time period, is censored. We extend the interval estimator using the asymptotic properties of the MLE to account for right censoring. Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate the performance of this interval estimator; the censoring effect on efficiency is discussed for a variety of situations
Keywords :
Monte Carlo methods; binomial distribution; failure analysis; least mean squares methods; maximum likelihood estimation; reliability theory; Monte Carlo simulation; asymptotic interval-estimators; coverage probability; desired confidence; failure probability; geometric survival distribution; interval estimation; large-sample theory; maximum likelihood estimator; negative binomial; point estimation; relative mean-square-error; reliability; right-censoring; survivor function; uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator; Maximum likelihood estimation; Mean square error methods; Solid modeling; State estimation; Testing;