DocumentCode
1252073
Title
Extraction of Airways From CT (EXACT´09)
Author
Lo, Pechin ; van Ginneken, Bram ; Reinhardt, Joseph M. ; Yavarna, Tarunashree ; de Jong, Pim A. ; Irving, Benjamin ; Fetita, Catalin ; Ortner, Michael ; Pinho, Rômulo ; Sijbers, J. ; Feuerstein, Marco ; Fabijanska, Anna ; Bauer, Christian ; Beichel, Reinh
Author_Institution
Image Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Volume
31
Issue
11
fYear
2012
Firstpage
2093
Lastpage
2107
Abstract
This paper describes a framework for establishing a reference airway tree segmentation, which was used to quantitatively evaluate 15 different airway tree extraction algorithms in a standardized manner. Because of the sheer difficulty involved in manually constructing a complete reference standard from scratch, we propose to construct the reference using results from all algorithms that are to be evaluated. We start by subdividing each segmented airway tree into its individual branch segments. Each branch segment is then visually scored by trained observers to determine whether or not it is a correctly segmented part of the airway tree. Finally, the reference airway trees are constructed by taking the union of all correctly extracted branch segments. Fifteen airway tree extraction algorithms from different research groups are evaluated on a diverse set of 20 chest computed tomography (CT) scans of subjects ranging from healthy volunteers to patients with severe pathologies, scanned at different sites, with different CT scanner brands, models, and scanning protocols. Three performance measures covering different aspects of segmentation quality were computed for all participating algorithms. Results from the evaluation showed that no single algorithm could extract more than an average of 74% of the total length of all branches in the reference standard, indicating substantial differences between the algorithms. A fusion scheme that obtained superior results is presented, demonstrating that there is complementary information provided by the different algorithms and there is still room for further improvements in airway segmentation algorithms.
Keywords
Computed tomography; Image segmentation; Lungs; Medical diagnostic imaging; Computed tomography; evaluation; pulmonary airways; segmentation; Algorithms; Analysis of Variance; Databases, Factual; Humans; Lung; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Trachea;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0062
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMI.2012.2209674
Filename
6249784
Link To Document